Smith & Nephew
US Professional

Smith & Nephew Corporate

|

Select your country

Smith & Nephew

Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Products
  • Training and Education
  • Resources
  • News & Careers
  • Clinical Studies of the IDET Procedure
  • Clinical Studies of the IDET Procedure
  • All Products
  • Featured Products
  • Whats New
  • Wound measurement
  • Visualization / Image Management
  • Wound Bed Preparation
  • Surgical / Post Operative Wounds
  • Shoulder Replacement
  • Skincare/prevention
  • Scars
  • Resorbable Scaffolds
  • Resection
  • Pressure Ulcers
  • Plates & Screws
  • Palliative Care
  • Pain Management
  • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
  • Leg Ulcers
  • Laparoscopy
  • Knee Replacement
  • Joint Resurfacing
  • Joint Repair
  • IV Site Care
  • Internal Fixation
  • Hip Replacement
  • Gynecology
  • Grafts/Dermal substitutes
  • External Fixation
  • Donor Sites
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcers
  • Deformity Correction
  • Computer Assisted Surgery
  • Burns
  • Biomaterials
  • Access / Fluid Management
  • Clinical Therapies
  • Contact
  • Print
  • Forward

Email this page

close
  1. Mandatory fields are marked with an asterisk [*].

    Tell us who you want to send your mail to Fill in your email details

    Note: Smith & Nephew does not collect or make use of the email addresses or names provided here. They are only used to show the recipient who has sent the message.

    Change your message if you want Change the message if you want to

    1. <recipient name> <address>
    2. <sender name> <address>
    3. <sender name> is sending you a link

    4. <sender name>

    Visitor verification

    Validating...
Email sent successfully
Error: Check all fields are valid. Exclude special characters from Comments field
Smith
Nephew

Clinical Studies of the IDET Procedure

Clinical Studies

The safety and efficacy of the IDET◊ procedure have been evaluated in a number of clinical studies. Highlights from these studies include:

  • In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, IDET◊ procedure patients had significantly greater reductions in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and Oswestry disability scale.
  • In 6 prospective non-randomized studies, the proportion of patients with significant improvements in pain (using the VAS, SF-36, and other validated instruments) ranged from 45% to 67%.
  • In a multicenter study of 78 patients, 88% would definitely or probably choose the same treatment, and 61% were performing their jobs at 100% capacity vs 23% of patients prior to treatment.
  • ◊ Trademark of Smith & Nephew | This information intended for United States customers only
  • Accessibility
  • Copyright & Disclaimer