Smith & Nephew
US Professional

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Products
  • Training and Education
  • Resources
  • News & Careers
  • Home
  • Products
  • Featured Products
  • INTRADISCAL ELECTROTHERMAL Therapy
  • IDET
  • About the IDET◊ Procedure
  • Clinical Studies of the IDET◊ Procedure
  • Non-Randomized Studies
  • Less Than Two Years of Follow-up
  • Home >
  • Products >
  • Featured Products >
  • INTRADISCAL ELECTROTHERMAL Therapy >
  • IDET >
  • About the IDET◊ Procedure >
  • Clinical Studies of the IDET◊ Procedure >
  • Non-Randomized Studies >
  • Less Than Two Years of Follow-up
  • More Than Two Years of Follow-up
  • Less Than Two Years of Follow-up
  • Print
  • e-mail

Email this page

close
  1. Mandatory fields are marked with an asterisk [*].

    Tell us who you want to send your mail to Fill in your email details

    Note: Smith & Nephew does not collect or make use of the email addresses or names provided here. They are only used to show the recipient who has sent the message.

    Change your message if you want Change the message if you want to

    1. <recipient name> <address>
    2. <sender name> <address>
    3. <sender name> is sending you a link

    4. <sender name>

IDET™

INTRADISCAL ELECTROTHERMAL™ Therapy

  • Resources
  • About the IDET◊ Procedure
  • Insurance and Reimbursement
  • About Discogenic Lower Back Pain
  • News Highlights
  • Patient Stories

Less Than Two Years of Follow-up

Prospective Studies Less than Two Years
  • Click here to contact us

The following non-randomized prospective studies have less than two years of follow-up data on the IDET◊ procedure:

  • Singh 2000

Singh V. INTRADISCAL ELECTROTHERMAL◊: a preliminary report. Pain Physician. 2000;3:367-373.

Of the 23 patients in this prospective pilot study, 21 were available for follow-up. All patients reported significant relief of pain. Statistically significant differences on all pain scales and significant improvements in walking and standing were seen. No complications were reported. The number and percentage of patients reporting different levels of pain relief after the IDET◊ procedure were as follows:

  • Relief < 50%: 7 (33%)
  • Relief > 50%: 14 (67%)

  • Lutz 2003

Lutz C, Lutz GE, Cooke PM. Treatment of chronic lumbar diskogenic (discogenic) pain with intradiskal (INTRADISCAL) ELECTROTHERMAL◊ Therapy: a prospective outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:23-35.

In a prospective study of 33 patients with chronic lumbar discogenic pain treated with the IDET◊ procedure, 77% of the patients said they would have the same procedure performed for the same outcome. The outcome measures used in this study were VAS pain scores, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and North American Spine Society Patient Satisfaction Index (NASS). Mean duration of follow-up was 15 months.

  • Mean improvement in VAS scores was 3.9 (P<0.001).
  • Mean improvement in RMDQ was 7.3 (P<0.001). The threshold for clinically significant improvement in RMDQ in chronic low back pain is 4-5 points.
  • The most common complication after the procedure was increased pain, which is an expected outcome that generally resolves within a week. There were no complications of infection, nerve injury, or dural puncture or tear.

  • Gerszten 2002

Gerszten PC, Welch WC, McGrath PM, Willis SL. A prospective outcomes study of patients undergoing INTRADISCAL ELECTROTHERMAL◊ (IDET◊) for chronic low back pain. Pain Physician. 2002;5:360-364.

Assessments were conducted at baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after the IDET◊ procedure in 27 patients. At 1 year, 45% reported significant improvement (≥ 7 points) on the SF-36, and 75% had improvement of symptoms on the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. No serious complications were reported. Cerebral spinal fluid was visualized in one case.

  • Derby 2000

Derby R, Eek B, Chen Y, O’Neill C, Ryan D. INTRADISCAL ELECTROTHERMAL◊ annuloplasty (IDET◊): a novel approach for treating chronic discogenic back pain. Neuromodulation. 2000;3:82-89.

In this prospective outcome study in 32 patients, 4 instruments (RMDQ, VAS, PSI and ADL) were combined to create a classification scheme for rating success. A favorable outcome required improvement on 3 of the instruments. Overall results at 1 year were as follows:

  • 62.5% had a favorable outcome.
  • 12.5 % had an unfavorable outcome.
  • 25% had no change.
  • 78% of patients said they would undergo same treatment for same outcome.
  • One patient had spinal fusion surgery for persistent discogenic back pain.

  • Mekhail 2004

Mekhail N, Kapural L. INTRADISCAL THERMAL◊ annuloplasty for discogenic pain: an outcome study. Pain Practice. 2004;4:84-90.

Of 34 patients enrolled, 32 were followed over the next 12 months. Pain disability questionnaires were completed at 2 weeks and 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. VAS scores and ADL self-assessment were also used.

  • Significant decrease in pain at 2 weeks post-procedure, sustained 3-12 months (P<0.001).
  • Significant improvement in ADL after weeks maintained significance through 12 months.
  • Average of 78% pain decrease at 12 months.

  • ◊ Trademark of Smith & Nephew | This information intended for United States customers only
  • Accessibility
  • Copyright & Disclaimer